By Garth Calitz
The International Air Services Council (IASC) has recently made a ruling that has put FlySafair in a precarious position due to non-compliance with local regulations concerning foreign ownership. This ruling has raised concerns about the potential jeopardy of FlySafair's operating license, a critical aspect of the airline's future operations.
The investigation conducted by the IASC into FlySafair's shareholding structure, initiated in October 2022, stems from formal complaints lodged by Airlink and Global Aviation (operator of LIFT) in February of the same year. According to reports from Business Day, these complaints have triggered a series of events leading to the current situation.
It has been determined by the IASC that FlySafair's shareholding structure violates South African law, which sets a strict cap of 25% on foreign ownership of domestic airlines. The primary concern revolves around the control exerted by Ireland-based ASL Aviation Holdings over FlySafair, with direct and indirect stakes that collectively exceed the legal limit.
Moreover, allegations have surfaced suggesting that FlySafair has neglected to update its air service license to reflect changes in its ownership structure since March 2019, further complicating the regulatory landscape for the airline.
Anticipating potential sanctions from the IASC, FlySafair faces a range of possible outcomes, including license suspension or revocation, as well as financial penalties unless corrective actions are promptly taken to align with the foreign ownership regulations.
Despite the challenges, FlySafair has maintained its stance on compliance, emphasizing adherence to legal boundaries and transparency in dealings with regulatory bodies. The CEO, Elmar Conradie, conveyed disappointment with the ruling but expressed a commitment to resolving the matter efficiently to mitigate any adverse impact on the business.
Seeking clarity from the Pretoria High Court, FlySafair has raised concerns about the potential disruption in the aviation industry caused by inconsistent interpretations of foreign ownership laws. The timing of these developments, particularly ahead of South Africa's summer school holidays, underscores the urgency for a swift resolution to avoid disruptions in air travel.
As FlySafair holds a significant market share on domestic routes, the outcome of this regulatory issue carries substantial implications not only for the airline but also for the broader aviation landscape in South Africa.
Comments